Some women may benefit from additional mammography screening

Women with particularly dense breast tissue may benefit from additional investigations to standard mammography, research has suggested.

A trial of more than 9,000 women found that extra imaging done with abbreviated MRI or contrast-enhanced mammography picked up cancers that had not been detected with standard mammogram.

Related Article: Women at increased COPD risk even if they have never smoked

If the approach was adopted on the NHS, the extra scans could treble cancer detection potentially saving up to 700 lives a year in the UK, the researchers at the University of Cambridge reported in The Lancet.

Around 10% of women have very dense breasts as shown by mammogram. Between the ages of 50 and 70, they are up to four-times more likely to develop breast cancer compared to women with low breast density.

Per 1,000 women screened, the two scanning methods detected 17-19 cancers that were not seen in mammograms. Adding either of them to existing screening programmes could detect 3,500 more cancers a year, the team calculated.

A third method – automated whole breast ultrasound – did pick up more cases than mammography alone but was not as effective as abbreviated MRI or contrast-enhanced mammography.

Related Article: Researchers find many more ME/CFS patients in England than previously reported

It is the first trial to directly compare supplemental imaging methods and to investigate their value for early cancer detection as part of widespread screening.

But further research is needed to confirm whether picking up extra cases of cancer through the additional scans leads to a reduction in the number of deaths.

Study lead Professor Fiona Gilbert, honorary consultant radiologist at Addenbrooke’s Hospital in Cambridge, said: ‘Getting a cancer diagnosis early makes a huge difference for patients in terms of their treatment and outlook.

Related Article: Healthy childhood diet linked to later menarche in girls

‘We need to change our national screening programme so we can make sure more cancers are diagnosed early, giving many more women a much better chance of survival.’

This article was initially published by our sister publication Pulse.